Spruit (2014). Increasing efficiency of surgical training: effects of spacing practice on skill acquisition and retention in laparoscopy training.

Reviewed by Tony Ingram, PhD
Review posted December 10, 2024

Full Citation

Spruit, E. N., Band, G. P., & Hamming, J. F. (2014). Increasing efficiency of surgical training: effects of spacing practice on skill acquisition and retention in laparoscopy training. Surgical Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3931-x

Abstract

Objectives The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of spaced versus massed practice on skill acquisition and retention in the context of laparoscopic motor skill training. Background Reaching proficiency in performing laparoscopic surgery involves extensive training to acquire the required motor skills. Conventionally, training of such skills occurs during a full day training event utilizing surgical simulators that train specific motor skills pertinent to laparoscopic surgery. An important variable to consider is the optimal schedule for laparoscopic motor training. Methods In this study, two groups of trainees without prior experience were trained on a variety of physical box-trainer tasks on different time-schedules. One group received three 75-min training sessions on a single day (massed condition) and the other received one 75-min training session per week for three consecutive weeks (spaced condition). Short- and long-term retention were assessed 2 weeks and 1 year after the completion of training. Results Outcome measures indicated better performance at the end of training, at a 2-week delayed retention session and at a 1-year retention session for the group that received training on a spaced schedule. This spacing effect was most pronounced for the more difficult laparoscopic training tasks such as intra-corporeal suturing. On average, 21 % of participants in the massed group and 65 % in the spaced group reached proficiency by the end of training. Conclusions Spacing practice of laparoscopic motor skill training will facilitate skill acquisition, short-term and long-term retention, and thus, a more efficient learning process for trainees. Though more challenging in terms of logistics, training courses in medical centers should distribute practice sessions over longer time intervals.

Key Results

Result Name

Effect Size

Reliability

Spaced vs. Massed: Simple Tasks (Immediate Performance)

Large

High

Spaced vs. Massed: Simple Tasks (Long-Term Learning, 2 Weeks)

Spaced vs. Massed: Simple Tasks (Long-Term Learning, 1 Year)

Spaced vs. Massed: Complex Tasks (Immediate Performance)

Spaced vs. Massed: Complex Tasks (Long-Term Learning, 2 Weeks)

Spaced vs. Massed: Complex Tasks (Long-Term Learning, 1 Year)

Study Characteristics

Learning Domain	Procedural Learning
Study Topic	Massed Practice, Spaced Practice
Study Type	Membership Required
Task Studied	Membership Required
Subject Type	Membership Required
Quality Score (%)*	Membership Required

Unlock Full Access

* Study quality assessed using JBI Systematic Review Checklist.

Reviewer Notes

The training of surgical skills is a common real-world skill investigated in motor learning research. This study looked at whether the benefits of spaced practice — known for many decades to be beneficial for learning — apply to surgical training, because (it claims) most training occurs on a massed practice schedule because it’s easier to organize. This is a good point — massed practice is often associated with “cramming”, but sometimes it’s simply practical. Generally, the results show that once again spaced practice is superior. But what makes this study more interesting is that it breaks down the effect on simple versus complex skills, and the follow-up periods are very long — testing a year after training.

Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque.

Donec lobortis risus a elit. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Donec fermentum. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Etiam tempor. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus.

Spruit (2014). Increasing efficiency of surgical training: effects of spacing practice on skill acquisition and retention in laparoscopy training.

Table of Contents

Full Citation

Abstract

Key Results

Study Characteristics

Reviewer Notes

Link to Study

Privacy

Legal